Sin and the Law

It is a confusing time to be an American Christian. Or at least it should be, especially when it comes to views about sin. It's fascinating how biblical teachings have evolved into a theology which takes the emphasis off how harshly we judge ourselves and places the focus on making sure others are not "living in sin."

Perhaps (and this is a big perhaps) if our thoughts are strictly to help others by revealing to them the error of their ways, so they can enter into a life of blessing, it would be more understandable. But we witness daily a huge segment of Christian society which seems to have as its goal eradication of sin in others simply because the sin is seen to be offensive. I am unconvinced this is what Jesus had in mind.

Jesus taught the concept of unconditional love, a phrase which is heard in many Christian circles, most often as it applies to God's mercy in dealing with us. Is that message lost in translation when we look at others? Do we ask for unconditional love but refuse to give it?

We see some trying mightily to address certain "sin" issues through the law. How did particular sins get chosen to be targeted? 

Without exploring the history of the "seven deadly sins" in Christian tradition, they are usually recognized as: lying, wrath, greed, sloth, pride, lust, envy and gluttony. Those concepts are supported by scripture and join other Old and New Testament lists of sins which include things such as adultery, divorce, fornication, idolatry, sorcery, hatred and revelings.

Certainly there are sins which are currently against the law which should be outlawed in civilized society -- murder and perjury come to mind in that category. But should greed, for example, be against the law? If not, why not, when stealing is a crime? Jesus made it clear he intended for his followers to give of their resources to help others. It is difficult to deny that helping those in poverty is one of the major commands of scripture. This is one reason why it’s a confusing time for Christianity in America because we are a country which, by law and governmental practice, embraces greed in the name of capitalism, while at the same time is becoming less tolerant of helping those in need.

Back to what sins should be against the law. The solution does not seem to be the need for more laws against a few subjectively defined sins. (An example: Why are divorce and adultery legal -- with no campaigns by Christians to ban them -- while gay marriage is such a heated target? Another example: Some very limited efforts have been made to address the sin of gluttony through legislation. But limiting the size of sugary sodas and other food which helps make us fat is seen as a "liberal effort" to take away our personal rights. Am I the only who finds this confusing?) The standards of Jesus transcend what can be legislated. Additionally, if a “Christian nation” can’t abide by the teachings of Jesus out of simple devotion to him, there isn’t any reason to believe everyone will do what’s right out of fear of a fine or imprisonment. 

A little more focus on our own sins and a little less glaring spotlight on the shortcomings of others is also a good place to start.